Vista View

Online


Tolerance: Do we not all bleed, laugh, and die?
By Rev. John Iwohara
Originally published in the Fresno Betsuin Buddhist Temple Geppo

July 1997

Contents

Front Page

From Rev. John's Desk

On Values, An Opinion

President's Notes

Vista View Back Issues 

Vista Buddhist Temple Home Page

Artist: Mrs. Margaret Ishii

Although many people tend to blur the differences between religions, there are, needless to say, many important differences. Perhaps one of the reasons for wanting to blur these differences is because wars can be caused and justified by differences in religious beliefs. Many people become confused when confronted with the contradiction between religion as a vehicle that allows humanity to transcend individual limitations, allowing them to participate in a greater unity; versus religion that is used to justify and fuel cruel and brutal wars.

Religion can be the great unifier of humankind because it allows individuals to see beyond their differences. Being affiliated with any particular religious group allows one to feel a sense of community or belonging. This is one of the great gifts religion has to offer. It allows us to see that, to borrow the words of William Shakespeare, "If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die?"

Unfortunately, these words from the play "The Merchant of Venice," were spoken from a heart of a character that wanted revenge, and this heart of revenge was intensified because of a difference in religious beliefs. Thus, the great gift of religion can also become its greatest pitfall: the feelings of superiority and righteousness--the difference between the "them" and the "us."

In light of this, there seems to be some wisdom in blurring such differences. Conventional wisdom tells us to "never discuss religion or politics." However, we must ask ourselves "Do we really gain more than we lose by this silence?"

Buddhism in general, and Jodo Shinshu in particular, is especially careful in guarding against this trap of religion. For example, Shotoku Taishi (574 - 622)--perhaps the single most important person in making Japan a Buddhist country--stated in his seventeen article constitution:

Article 10. Severing ourselves from grudges and throwing away anger. Do not become angry over the differences of people. Everyone has a heart and every heart has a perspective. If you say the other is right, then I become wrong; you say I am right, then the other becomes wrong. I am not always the sage and the other is not always the idiot; we are both, together, just foolish beings (bonbu). How is the truth of right and wrong to be established? That we are, together, smart and stupid, is similar to the ear ring which has no end.

With this, although we may become angry at other people, we should, instead, be fearful that we may be in error. Although you may feel that you alone have gained an insight into what is correct, you should follow the majority and do things together.

Shinran Shonin, the founder of Jodo Shinshu Buddhism, expresses a similar sentiment when he is quoted as saying:

Even if all other schools of Buddhism may ridicule us by saying that the Nembutsu (central practice of the Pure Land tradition of Buddhism) is for worthless people and that our doctrine is shallow and contemptible, we must avoid dispute and simply say, "We believe because we are taught that the poorly gifted and illiterate people like us will be saved through Faith. This teaching may be contemptible to the highly gifted people, but for us it is the highest teaching. Even if other teachings may be superior, we cannot abide by them since they are beyond our capacity. Since the real intent of all Buddhas is that both we and others should be freed from Samsara ("suffering") please do not disturb us."

If we treat them thus, without spite, who would harm us? Moreover, we should remember that there is a testimonial passage, "Where there is a dispute various evil passions arise. The wise, therefore, should avoid such an act. (Chapter 12 of the Tannisho, translation from Ryukoku Translation Series, 1980)

Words like these are particularly refreshing to the West because they emphasize the tolerance of others. Although it is true that words like those quoted above can teach us to become more tolerant, this again shows a very Western bias: "I am tolerating you." Instead of trying to show us the virtues of tolerance, I believe that these and similar expressions are more interested in revealing to us our limitations as foolish beings or bonbu.

For example, at a funeral held at the Betsuin, all those who gathered were told of how the deceased, because of the dignity he displayed during the last moments of his life, had shown that he was blessed with the love of God. The deceased’s Christian friends and relatives can rest at ease knowing that they will meet again in heaven. Even after death, religion can become the great unifier.

Perhaps I was born a skeptic, but I had to ask myself, "What if he, like Shinran Shonin, did not go so gracefully? Would that prove that he was not blessed by God?" Fortunately for everyone’s sake he did pass away with dignity. Unfortunately, on the other hand, with regard to the blessing of God, it seems that we are forced to prove ourselves even in death.

In the Tannisho passage quoted above, Shinran Shonin makes a point of emphasizing that we are "poorly gifted and illiterate people," or people who are unable to prove themselves. Although Jodo Shinshu does make a distinction between having shinjin (Buddhist "faith") and not having shinjin, this distinction is made only at the personal level and does not extend to the interpersonal. We cannot, in other words, judge others.

Instead, we feel the responsibility of knowing that if I am not saved, then Amida Buddha (the central Buddha in the Pure Land Schools of Buddhism of which Jodo Shinshu is a part) has promised to renounce his enlightenment as well. The tolerance that a Jodo Shinshu Buddhist should demonstrate is not one of "I tolerate you," but one based on a sense of humility because we are foolish beings who feel a need to prove how right we are at the expense of others.

Once again quoting from Shinran Shonin, as found in the Tannisho:

When I carefully consider the Vow which Amida brought forth after five kalpas (an incalculably long measure of time) of contemplation, I find that it was solely for me, Shinran, alone! So, how gracious is the Original Vow of Amida who resolved to save me, possessed of many karmic sins!

NAMO AMIDA BUTSU NAMO AMIDA BUTSU NAMO AMIDA BUTSU

[Vista View Index] [VBT Home Page ]